Rome -” Pope Francis appeared to flatly reject proposals in some theological circles to add “co-redemptrix” to the list of titles of the Virgin Mary, saying the Mother of Jesus never took anything that belonged to her Son, and calling the invention of new titles and dogmas “foolishness”.PF

So, my friends, forget the Fifth Marian Dogma, for whose declaration you have worked and prayed so long for, from one of our Post Conciliar Popes.  Is it possible, that Francis fears in his heart, that if he were to try to speak infallibly and pronounce Mary as Mediatrix – CoRedemptrix that, somehow, his words would not work?  That he may be embarrassed before the whole world by some Work of God when his words hit the microphones and flew back down his throat?    After all only the Pope can speak infallibly!     Haurietisaquas

“She never wanted for herself something that was of her Son,” Francis said.  “She never introduced herself as co-redemptrix.  No.  Disciple.” he said. Meaning that Mary saw herself as a disciple of Jesus.”PF

We know that on Golgotha “there stood by the Cross of Jesus His Mother”  (Jn. 19:25).  St. Maximillian teaches that “Mary, by the fact that she is Mother of Jesus the Savior, became the Coredemptrix of the human race.”  St. Maximilliam Kolbe

“Mary, the Pope insisted, “never stole for herself anything that was of her son,” instead “serving him.”  Because she is mother.  She gives life. ” PF

Mary never stole anything. The word is an insult when used next to her name. haurietisaquas

The title of Mary as “Co-Redemptrix” dates to the Middle Ages, and the idea of declaring it as a church dogma was discussed, though not adopted, at the Second Vatican council.  In the 1990s American Catholic theologian Mark Miravalle launched a petition asking the Pope to make such a declaration, and, today the ‘Co-Redemptrix” devotion tends to be strongest among more conservative Catholics.  Crux

What Francis Said is in line with Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Vatican doctrinal chief during most of St. John Paul II papacy, and now Pope emeritus Benedict XVI.  Crux

Speaking with Peter Seewald for the book-length interview published as ‘ God and the World:  A Conversation’,  the then Cardinal said:  “The formula Coredemptrix departs to too great an extent from the language of Scripture and of the Fathers, and therefore gives rise to misunderstandings.”BXVI

Au contraire, Your Emeritus Holiness, but it is the language of MODERNISM which gives rise to misunderstandings.  Haurietisaquas

Mary the print of La Morenita (little brunette) that stood tall in front and to the side of the altar made him (Francis) “think of three adjectives for Mary:  ‘woman-Lady-, Mother and Mestiza  (mixed race)”

“Mary introduces herself as a woman.”  PF said.  “And she introduces herself with the message of someone else.  Meaning, she’s a woman and she’s disciple.”

A true modernist would know, your Holiness.   How to introduce yourself with the message of someone else.  You do it all the time. And here also, we are getting to the crux of this thing…. If she is a woman and a disciple, then she is a woman and a priest. haurietisaquas

“Christian piety, throughout the ages, always sought to praise her with new titles.” Francis said.  “They were filial titles.” that expressed “the love of the people of God, but they did not touch in any way her being a woman disciple.”PF

Here Francis just got the term ‘woman disciple’ inserted again for an extra brainwash on us.  haurietisaquas

St. Ignatius, Francis said, liked to call the Virgin “Our Lady.”  According to the Argentine pontiff, “It is as simple as that.  She doesn’t expect anything else.  She’s a woman, she’s disciple.”

There you go again, Pope.  Four  times now.  Mary was a disciple.  So she can be a priest.  We’re gettin’ it!   haurietisaquas

St. Ignatius, Francis said, liked to call the Virgin Our Lady.  According to the Argentine Pontiff, “it is as simple as that.  She doesn’t expect anything else.  She’s a woman, she’s disciple.”

At Lourdes, Our Lady said “I am The Immaculate Conception.” So you see Your Holiness,  She does want more. She is the one and only creature born without original sin.  And God wants her to have more.  He wants Russia to be consecrated to her Immaculate Heart.   She wants us to learn about Her and so does God.

The Pope also quoted St. Bernard who said that no praise is enough to talk about Mary, but that in the end, nothing is as representative of her ‘humble discipleship more than being faithful to her master, who is Her Son, the only Redeemer.

The Memore by St. Bernard  “Remember O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known, that anyone who fled to thy protection was left unaided …”  The power of Mary is inconceivable by mortal men!   haurietisaquas

The Pontiff then moved on to the next adjective,  that of “mother”  Mary is the Mother of all peoples.  To us all … of our hearts … of our souls … and also the mother of the Church.  and she’s also a “figure in the Church” PF

We cannot think about the Church without this Marian principle” he said.  “When we look for the role of the woman in the Church, we can go through the path of functionality, because the woman has functions to fulfill in the Church.  But that leaves us halfway. PF

“Mary woman, Mary Mother, without any other essential”  Francis insisted.  Even the litanies, recited at the end of the rosary, are titles given to her by her children who are in love with her and who sing to their mother.  But in the end, they don’t change that ‘essence’ of being ‘Mary, woman and mother.” PF

You forgot one, Your Holiness.  Mother of God.  haurietisaquas

The third adjective, the pope said means Mary becoming ‘mestiza’  to be the mother of everyone.  “She became ‘mestiza with humanity.  Because she made God mestizo.  And this is the great mystery.  Mary makes God a mestizo, true God but also true man.” ?(mestiza – mixed race)

“Mary is woman, Our Lady;  Mary is the mother of her Son and of the Holy hierarchical Church, a woman of our peoples but who made God a mestizo.” PF

“Mary is the mother of her Son….”  Why CAN’T you say it, Your Holiness … Mary is the Mother of God !  Her Son is God.   The Incarnation is DOGMA haurietisaquas

In its decree, the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) of the Holy See argued that Pope Pius XII made a “definitive” condemnation in 1951 against “the supposed apparitions” and declared they “were not of supernatural origin”

If Pope Pius XII made a “definitive confirmation” in 1951, of the decree, as the CBCP claims, then that “definitive confirmation” would be noted on the decree itself, as is the case with the July 1961 decree of the Holy Office condemning the “All Nations” apparitions in Amsterdam.

The significance of such a notation is explained in Code of Canon Law and Commentary by James Corriden et at, published by the Canon Law Society of America.

According to Canon Law, if there appears on a decree of the Holy Office such words as “With the approval of the Supreme Pontiff”, or, after consultation with the Supreme Pontiff”, then the decree has the authority of a papal act.

If a diocesan decree has such a phrase as “after consultation with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith” … as is the case with the Declaration of the Diocese of Brooklyn, N.Y. on the alleged apparitions of Bayside … or “with the approval of the CDF” then the Decree has the force of a Roman curial act.

There is no such clause on the April 11, 1951 decree:                                                                                                                             We, the undersigned Archbishops and Bishops, consulting for the purpose of a special commission, have attentively examined and reviewd the evidence and testimonies in the course of repeated long and careful examinations, have reached the unanimous conclusion and hereby officially declare that the above mentioned evidence and testimonies exclude any supernatural intervention in the reported extraordinary happenings, including the shower of petals, at the Carmel of Lipa                                                                                                                      (Signed)  Gabriel M. Reyes                                                                                                      Archbishop of Manila                                                                                                            (Signed)  Mariano Madriaga                                                                                                  Bishop of Lingayen                                                                                                             (Signed)  Cesar M. Guerrero                                                                                                  Bishop of San Fernando                                                                                                         (Signed)  Juan Sisson                                                                                                            Auxiliary Bishop of Nueva Segovia                                                                                      (Signed)  Vincent Reyes                                                                                                         Auxiliary Bishop of Manila                                                                                                 (Signed)  Rufino Santos                                                                                                           Apostolic Administrator of Lipa, Manila,

11 April 1951                                                                                                                         Concordat cum original                                                                                                    (Signed)   Egidio Vagnozzi                                                                                                     (Apostolic Nuncio)

“If Pius XII whispered his “definitive confirmation” or wrote it, signed it and put it in a drawer – but it was not noted on the decree, then the decree has no force beyond its own face value, and the alleged “definitive confirmation” would be utterly bereft of any juridical force whatsoever.

The onus is on the CDF to produce the evidence of the alleged confirmation, otherwise the claim must be dismissed by the CBCP as apocryphal.  It is standard procedure to note the approval of a higher authority on the decree itself.  Such a notation is nowhere to be found on the decree April 1951;  and it is inconceivable that Pius XII issued some other decree condemning the 11/04/1951 decree on Lipa, since such a decree is totally unknown to ever have existed, and unless duly promulgated, it would remain bereft of all juridical force.

A Deliberate Act of Fraud in Order to deceive the Catholic Hierarchy and the Faithful of the Philippine

Whoever it was in the CDF who claimed that Pius XII made a “definitive confirmation in 1951” and declared “they were not of supernatural origin” must have studied Canon Law at the Alice in Wonderland Institute, or else has perpetrated a deliberate act of fraud in order to deceive the Catholic hierarchy and the faithful of the Philippines.

There are many in the Vatican who hate the true message of Fatima (real 3rd secret of apostasy) because the Vatican is entrenched with Modernists, Masons and Marxists … all trying to finalize their One World Religion”

Father Paul Kramer

Mystery of Iniquity                                                                                                                                 The Devils Final Battle                                                                                                                            To Deceive The Elect

     tradcatknight.org

(Signed

December 6, 2019  Family Research Council                Life Site News

In a recently released clip from inside a Chinese police station, a lone man sits strapped into a metal-cage-like contraption that looks like it is meant to subdue a wild animal, but is actually used for the interrogation of ordinary citizens.

With downcast eyes and a timid voice, he softly answers a series of questions from his interrogators, apologizing for drinking “a bit too much” and speaking “nonsense.”

His crime?  He apparently made a negative remark or two on social media about the police confiscating motorcycles.  What’s wrong with the police confiscating motorcycles?” the interrogator demands?

“Nothing wrong with that,” the man feebly responds.

At the end of the video, after repeatedly expressing his sorrow for his “crime” in response to multiple demands by the interrogators to explain himself, the man makes a final plea for mercy.  With a bow of his head, he solemnly declares, ““Uncle Police I’m so sorry.  I’m wrong.  I know that now.  Please forgive me.  I won’t do it again.

Interrogations like these are now becoming a routine part of life in China.  With no civil rights and an encroaching regine that monitors every aspect of daily life, ordinary citizens like this man know that if they say something on social media that the government doesn’t like and say the wrong thing to police, they could end up in prison, tortured, or killed.

But this is just the tip of the iceberg of the human rights atrocities and abuses that the Chinese communist Party (CCP) is perpetrating against its own people.  Here is a brief list:

As we have written about previously, the CCP is forcibly harvesting the organs of religious minorities to fuel an organ industry to the tune of $10 -$20 million, which provides up to 85 percent of the world’s organ transplants  (more on that later ((Life Site News)) )

The CCP has been persecuting and executing the traditionally Muslim Uyghurs since at least the 1990s.  Today over 1.5 million ethnic Uyghurs are currently imprisoned in what the CCP calls “concentrated education and training schools,” in which detainees are subjected to indoctrination sessions, torture, sexual assault, and execution.

The CCP continues to mandate the number of children couples can have, which recently changed from a one-child to a two0child policy  This system is enforced through exorbitant monetary fines, forced abortions, and forced sterilizzations.  It is estimated that theyere have been more than 330 million induced abortions in china since the one-child was first implemented in the early 1980s.  A significant (but unknown) percentage of these abortions were forced.

The CCP’s reign of terror against religious practitioners has been ongoing since the 1960s.  Currently, religious practice is being suppressed by any means necessary.

The CCP is implementing a “social credit system” that rates the behaviour of Chinese citizens so that their ranking fluctuates up and down.  Depending on your score, you can be banned from buying plane and train tickets, your children can be banned from attending the best schools, you can be denied jobs, and you can be publicly named a “bad citizen” among a host of other injustices.

As these human rights atrocities and abuses illustrate, China is in fact a criminal state.  The final report compiled by the China Tribunal which amassed definitive evidence of forced organ harvesting that has happened and is currently happening in China makes this conclusion:

Governments and any who interact in any substantial way with the PRC (People’s Republic of China) including:

•  Doctors and Medical Institutions
•  Industry, and businesses, most specifically airlines, travel companies, financial services, businesses, law firms and pharmaceutical and insurance companies together with individual tourists.
• Educational establishments
• Arts establishments

Should now recognise that they are, to the extent revealed above, interacting with a criminal state.

Family Research Council  FRC  could not agree more.  Organizations like the NBA, Hollywood, and other industries that have conveniently ignored the human rights atrocities and abuses committed by the CCP for financial gain must answer to the fact thatt they are dealing with a criminal state.  And as we have repeatedly pointed out,the United States must address these atrocities and abuses in its current and future trade and diplomatic dealings with the CCP.

Why No Nuremberg Trials For The Communists?  The reason is well pointed out in the above paragraph.  The complicity of Hollywood, the US Government in ignoring Joseph McCarthy, the NBA and those who say “So What?” …  yes the complicity and protection  on their part is advancing the Communist ideology.

Nazi officials were hung at Nuremburg.  Communist officials who torture, imprison, brainwash their brethren go scot free about their business because the world turns a blind eye.

And then  … there is Pope Francis and Cardinal Theodore McCarrick who shake hands with the commies and turn their brethren over to the police state without blinking an eye. Communism is advancing upon the world . Shame upon you all!  haurietisaquas

Pope Pius IV;  Giovanni Angelo Medici;  Canon Lawyer:   Recovened and Concluded the Council of Trent;  Ruled the Papal States   B 1499 –  D 1565

Definitive Language In the Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, February 16, 1559, Section 9 We Read:

“We declare that if ever it should appear that any bishop, even one acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch, or Primate, or a Cardinal of the Roman Church, or a legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, whether prior to his promotion to Cardinal, or prior to his election as Roman Pontiff, has beforehand deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into any heresy, we enact, we decree, we determine, we define:  Such promotion or election in and of itself, even with the agreement and unanimous consent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, legally invalid, and void.

It shall not be possible for such a promotion or election to be deemed valid or to be valid, neither through reception of office, consecration, subsequent administration, or possession, not even through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff himself, together with the veneration and obedience accorded him by all.

Such promotion or election shall not through any lapse of time in the foregoing situation be considered even partially legitimate in any way.

Each and all of the words,, as acts, laws, appointments of these so promoted or elected – and indeed, whatsoever flows here from – shall be lacking in force, and shall grant no stability and legal power to anyone whatsoever.

Those so promoted or elected, by that very fact, and, without the need to make any further declaration, shall be deprived of any dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office and power.

Therefore, it is permitted to no one to impair this page of approval, renewal, sanction, statute, wills of repeal, of decrees,  or to go contrary to it by a rash daring deed.

If anyone, moreover, will have presumed to attempt this, he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”

Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio,  February 16, 1559

By:   Famed Geneticist;  Servant of God;   Professor Jerome Lejeune

At the age of one month, a human being measures four millimeters and a half.  Its tiny heart is already beating from one week onwards, its arms, its legs, its head, its brain are already sketched out. he measures some three centimetres from his head to the tip of his buttocks.  Folded up he would fit inside a nutshell.

At two months old, he measures some three centimeters from his head to the tip of his buttocks.  Folded up he would fit inside a nutshell.

Inside a clenched fist he would be invisible, and the clenched fist would crush him without anyone noticing.  But open your hand, and there he is, complete, hands, feet, head, organs, brain, everything in place and only to grow bigger. Look closer, and you could already discern the lines on the hand and tell his fortune.  Look closer still, with an ordinary microscope, and you can make out his fingerprints.  From now on everything is already there to make up his passport.

The incredible Tom Thumb, a man smaller than my thumb, he really exists;  Not the one in the fairy tale, but the one which each of us was, once.

But the brain, someone will say, is only going to be completed in five or six months time.  But no, it will be entirely complete at birth;  but its innumerable links will be forged only at six or seven years old and its chemical and electrical machinery will be fully established at fourteen or fifteen !

The period as embryo is finally ended two months after its having been fertilized.  At this point the little one is as big as my thumb.  And that is why all mothers tell fairy tales to their children about Tom Thumb, for that one is a true story.

Every one of us was once Tom Thumb inside his mother and women have already known that there is a sort of underground country;  a sort of vaulted shelter with a reddish light and a rhythmic sound in which small human beings lead a strange and microscopic life.  And that is the real story of Tom Thumb.

Incredible Facts about Servant of God Professor Jerome Lejeune, Author of ‘Tom Thumb’                                                                                                                                        Jerome Jean Louis Marie Lejeune, geneticist:  born Montrouge, France 13 June 1926;  Director or Research, CNRS 1963-94; author of  ‘Discovery of the Extra Chromosome in Trisomy 21’ (mongolisim) 1959, married Birthe Bringsted (two sons, three daughters);  died Paris 3 April 1994.  His list of research and writings cover two 8×11 pages.

A pivotal figure in medical genetics, Prof. Lejeune is best remembered for his discovery 35 years ago of the chromosome abnormality which causes Down’s Syndrome.

Cardinal Fiorenzo Angelini, First President of the dicastery of Pastoral Care of  Health Care Workers opened the cause for Beatification of Professor LeJeune. ?1996

Once, In a sermon, given in St. Peters Basillica, in 1992, Cardinal Angelini stated that his career (as a priest) had suffered because of his positive views on Pope Pius XII.

This appears to be another tale of  Vatican secretive intricacies.

Why?

News of Chromosome 21 being doubled, and, thus being the cause of Downs Syndrome, is buried.  It should not be.  It ‘blows one away’

The Positio for sainthood of Professor Lejeune was delivered to the Congrazione delle Cause Dei Sainti, in Vatican, on May 5, 2007.  It was a culmination of ten years of combined efforts, in Paris and Rome.

Thank God for the introduction of his sainthood by Cardinal Fiorenzo Angelini 

“And whence is this that the mother of my Lord should come to me?”

Some Catholic commentators have maintained that the purpose of this visit was to bring divine grace to both Elizabeth and her unborn child.

Even though he was still in his mother’s womb, John became aware of the presence of Christ, and leapt for joy as he was cleansed from original sin and filled with divine grace.

Elizabeth also responded and recognised the presence of Jesus.

And thus … Mary exercised her function as mediatrix between God and man for the first time.

What a nice thought!  Hail Mary, Full of Grace!